Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 434%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 575%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics397% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive745% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory86.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 07:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 220
2-Core 425
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 833
8-Core 1,632
146% 1,232 Pts
64-Core 3,682
228% 3,682 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Lighting 638
Reflection 592
Parallax 745
520% 658 fps
MRender 544
Gravity 585
Splatting 310
375% 480 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 397%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000T700SSD3 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5634 5545 5800 5826 5753 5747 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
745% Outstanding
Read 6,212
Write 6,640
Mixed 3,407
SusWrite 5,718
1,236% 5,494 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 87.5
283% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,645
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1427
1,040% 1,368 MB/s
Poor: 381%
This bench: 745%
Great: 999%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH96GX5M2B6000C30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
202% Outstanding
MC Read 112
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 64.3
221% 77.4 GB/s
SC Read 41.5
SC Write 61.3
SC Mixed 49.3
145% 50.7 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 202%
Great: 284%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 20 60 27" 1280 720 DELA08E DELL S2740L
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback