Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 425%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 571%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics397% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive738% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory88.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 02:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$547
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 212
2-Core 389
119% 227 Pts
4-Core 774
8-Core 1,620
140% 1,197 Pts
64-Core 3,674
227% 3,674 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Lighting 636
Reflection 595
Parallax 743
519% 658 fps
MRender 544
Gravity 587
Splatting 314
377% 481 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 397%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000T700SSD3 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5392 5211 5440 5476 5478 5487 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
738% Outstanding
Read 6447
Write 6,743
Mixed 3,514
SusWrite 5414
1,243% 5,530 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 89.4
288% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,681
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,444
1,053% 1,387 MB/s
Poor: 381%
This bench: 738%
Great: 999%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH96GX5M2B6000C30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
291% Outstanding
MC Read 201
MC Write 64
MC Mixed 79.9
329% 115 GB/s
SC Read 46.3
SC Write 74.5
SC Mixed 55.8
168% 58.9 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 291%
Great: 284%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 DELA08E DELL S2740L
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback