Medion Erazer i72000/C057

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Erazer i72000/C057 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '23 at 17:14
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 184 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 535 52% 429 Pts	64-Core 560 35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.3% Poor	Lighting 27.3 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 40.8 22% 42.1 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 33.9 Splatting 43.8 37% 46 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0309 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 414 Write 186 Mixed 221 60% 274 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 16.2 84% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 58 63% 105 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
Hitachi HCS721050CLA362 500GB 881 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 82GB free Firmware: JP2OA52B SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 100 100 101 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 126 Write 122 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 100 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 1,126 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	57% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.9 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 18.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	49	60	27"	1920 1080	SAM0B67 S27D390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer i72000/C057 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Medion Erazer i72000/C057

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	5x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	1x

RAM
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 49%, 1,126 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16