Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 180
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 516
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 58.1
45% 60.5 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 53.3
47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi550 S3 1TB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 8.4 6.5 60 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 321
Write 232
Mixed 266
SusWrite 18.1
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 13.5
58% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 7.9
DQ Mixed 17.5
11% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
319GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65% Good
Read 114
Write 125
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 112
71% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
253GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 92 84 90 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 166
Write 157
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 90.6
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
103GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 92 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 88.1
56% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 15.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 41 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2475 2475W1
Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback