PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 24 '23 at 15:11 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
78.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Verbatim Vi550 S3 1TB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 8.4 6.5 60 9.7 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
319GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 111 112 111 MB/s
|
65%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
253GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 92 84 90 92 MB/s
|
73.6%
Very good
|
|||
55%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 59 | 41 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | AOC2475 2475W1 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 238x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 130x |
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 80x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 44x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $662 |