Intel H61S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel H61S  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 13:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 174
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 312
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 20.7
18% 20.2 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 17
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128gb EVM SSD 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220614a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 225 224 229 229 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 246
Write 228
Mixed 230
SusWrite 219
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 32.7
116% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 170
121% 152 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
908GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 104 111 95 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 53
Write 106
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 102
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
168% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 20" 1600 837 SAM078D SA300/SA350
Typical H61S Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback