Asus PRIME H270-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PRO  (all builds)
Memory40.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime6 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 12:54
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 125
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 668
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3526 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 206
Parallax 192
178% 206 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 151
Splatting 135
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 161 126 137 118 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 431
Mixed 345
SusWrite 165
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 48.6
161% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
2GB free
Firmware: S3401103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 392
Mixed 370
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 23
110% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 83.1
106% 183 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate ST9100821AS 100GB
19GB free
Firmware: 3.CMC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 34.6
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 34.2
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G HP37D4U1S8ME-16XR KHX2400C15/8G HP37D4U1S8ME-16XR 48GB
2400, 3200, 2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.1% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24.3
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 9G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 51% 43 214 59 144 31.5" 1920 1080 AOC3201 32G1WG4
Typical PRIME H270-PRO Builds (Compare 965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback