Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 17:53
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 580
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 123
Parallax 130
112% 130 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 107
Splatting 92.9
91% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$27
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 134 198 148 198 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,635
Write 1,143
Mixed 977
SusWrite 197
219% 988 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 29.7
174% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 533
DQ Mixed 476
403% 593 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 157%
Great: 228%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
252GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 580 586 592 589 591 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,349
Write 2,129
Mixed 1,658
SusWrite 636
378% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 70.3
230% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 688
513% 689 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 235%
Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 164 163 167 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 186
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 164
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 31.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 27.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 24" 1280 720 DELD0E1 S2419HGF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback