Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 19:44
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 187
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 532
52% 429 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 124
Parallax 129
111% 130 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 106
Splatting 92.9
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$27
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 414 319 275 133 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,603
Write 1,145
Mixed 984
SusWrite 294
224% 1,006 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 30.1
173% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 607
DQ Mixed 476
415% 620 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 163%
Great: 228%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
376GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 942 670 670 670 669 656 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,371
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,622
SusWrite 713
381% 1,704 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 68.9
226% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 695
520% 699 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 240%
Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 164 166 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 176
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 165
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 31.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 28
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 24" 1920 1009 DELD0E1 S2419HGF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback