Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$206
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 75.4
1-Core 208
2-Core 400
118% 228 Pts
4-Core 714
8-Core 1,145
114% 930 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8825) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 22
21% 22.9 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 13.4
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1898 981 946 993 968 945 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 3,896
Write 4,200
Mixed 2871
SusWrite 1,122
677% 3,022 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 85
298% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 2,013
DQ Write 1,617
DQ Mixed 1,760
1,332% 1,797 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 397%
Great: 598%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
617GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2396 2173 1405 1439 1424 1422 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2,391
Write 2224
Mixed 1,880
SusWrite 1,710
461% 2,051 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 84.2
286% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1779
DQ Write 1,412
DQ Mixed 1,582
1,188% 1,591 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 360%
Great: 410%
Avexir S100 SERIES - 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: AP001JB1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 173 158 159 157 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 473
Write 262
Mixed 245
SusWrite 180
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 35.1
138% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 127
132% 215 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 49.1
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 45
SC Write 54.7
SC Mixed 48.8
141% 49.5 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 138%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2707 VG27AQ1A
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback