Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 14:41
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$375
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 213
2-Core 428
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,616
145% 1,221 Pts
64-Core 2,778
172% 2,778 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
7.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 13.5
6% 11.4 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 21.1
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.92%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3401 3412 3453 2260 73 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 1,910
Write 3,419
Mixed 2,278
SusWrite 2,179
556% 2,447 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 83.8
308% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,694
DQ Write 1,479
DQ Mixed 1,640
1,215% 1,604 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 375%
Great: 419%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
750GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 129 128 129 128 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 142
Write 115
Mixed 20
SusWrite 126
128% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 44.9
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 48.2
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 46.3
137% 47.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 NSL2711 RGB-27QHD
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback