HP PRODESK 400 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP PRODESK 400 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83F3
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 12:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 512
58% 452 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 29.20.100.8881
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S160-240GB 240GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12521
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 406 342 223 201 237 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 452
Write 451
Mixed 408
SusWrite 304
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 31.7
114% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 236
178% 234 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.9" 1280 720 HPN350B HP N246v
Typical PRODESK 400 G4 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP PRODESK 400 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback