Asus GL553VE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus GL553VE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VE
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 19:43
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 506
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 37.8
31% 38.3 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 26.4
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Simmtronics 256GB 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 276 334 91 49 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 306
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 134
29% 124 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 4
34% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 0.8
59% 137 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 77%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
507GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 105 104 101 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 103
64% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.3% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 142 6 60 15.5" 1536 841 CMN15C4
Typical GL553VE Builds (Compare 1,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback