Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory28.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 246
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 663
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 13DC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 23.6
17% 21.1 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 16.4
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,281
Write 1,184
Mixed 1,088
264% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 56
181% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 757
530% 683 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 253%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB
4GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,667
Write 1,464
Mixed 1061
310% 1,397 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.5
180% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 741
528% 692 MB/s
Poor: 252% Great: 489%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston KHX2666C16S4/32G 39GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 12.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback