Alienware 17 R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware 17 R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 17 R4
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 18:22
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 527
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 07C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 119
Parallax 93.2
76% 102 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 106
82% 98.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 662 651 654 649 646 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,318
Write 2,026
Mixed 1,477
SusWrite 697
364% 1,630 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 63
202% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 584
447% 608 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 226%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
168GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1787 644 584 583 584 583 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,246
Write 2,002
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 794
369% 1,650 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 64.6
204% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 638
490% 667 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 233%
Great: 340%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
400GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 103 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 90.4
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 101
57% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ED9D3616 BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25.9
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 17.2" 1280 720 AUO1496
Typical 17 R4 Builds (Compare 2,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Alienware 17 R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback