Gigabyte GA-B760M DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230915
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 20:15
Run Duration486 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 184
2-Core 365
109% 209 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,166
112% 924 Pts
64-Core 1,590
98% 1,590 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 122
Parallax 148
110% 135 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 107
Splatting 0.1
60% 84 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 190
Write 94.7
Mixed 85
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 10.1
44% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 14.1
11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Team T253512GB 512GB
238GB free
Firmware: SN14357
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 449
Mixed 460
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48.1
179% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 278
204% 265 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
13GB free
Firmware: 03090004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 401
Write 306
Mixed 312
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 38.8
134% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 115
93% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
114GB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.1
Write 86.8
Mixed 47.6
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 65%
WD Elements 2621 4TB
1TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.9
Write 76.6
Mixed 52.3
84% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
91% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 62%
WD My Book 1130 1TB
746GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.5
Write 89.1
Mixed 60.4
101% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
744GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.2
Write 31.2
Mixed 14.5
36% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G56C46U5.M4G1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 29.1
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical GA-B760M DS3H Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback