Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 17:53
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G6900
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 51
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 49.7
40% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 45.2
8-Core 191
12% 118 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
EVGA(3842 4877) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 274
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 317
223% 219 fps
MRender 375
Gravity 254
Splatting 184
212% 271 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 196%
Great: 211%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1001 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,616
Write 1,965
Mixed 1,429
374% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 75.1
255% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 441
399% 619 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G56C46U5.M4G1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1920 1009 HPN354A HP 27f
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 390%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback