HP p6620it-m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP p6620it-m  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 14:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 136
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 310
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 881A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 9.2
7% 8.7 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 117 58 38 39 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.5% Poor
Read 255
Write 233
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 84.7
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
205GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 81 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 79.9
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 21 60 20.4" 1280 720 SAM0485 SyncMaster
Typical p6620it-m Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6620it-m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback