HP Laptop 15s-fr4xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fr4xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89BC
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 04:09
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 39.5
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 90.5
35% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 214
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 89BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.23 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.3
1% 1.87 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 684 719 761 659 641 672 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 956
Write 623
Mixed 697
SusWrite 689
166% 742 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 28.8
106% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 187
140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 324%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 7.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B14
Typical Laptop 15s-fr4xxx Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-fr4xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback