Gigabyte GA-B250M-Wind-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B250M-Wind
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-Wind-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 01:32
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 140
60% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 230
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 69
Parallax 59.9
52% 64.4 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 64.7
51% 61.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1108A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 117 127 127 128 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 171
Write 103
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 122
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 7.5
55% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 50.4
55% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 87%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
100GB free
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 125 118 118 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 89.1
Write 89.3
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 121
58% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Tigo-2400MHz-8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 19% 42 169 27 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACR074D KG241Q S
Typical GA-B250M-Wind-CF Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-Wind-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $202
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback