Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 147% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '23 at 21:37
Run Duration	361 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 226 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 175 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 691 62% 521 Pts	64-Core 2,507 155% 2,507 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385 21,427 User benchmarks, average bench 145% Asus(1043 891B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Lighting 214 Reflection 285 Parallax 235 175% 245 fps	MRender 306 Gravity 168 Splatting 123 154% 199 fps
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 157%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170 45,230 User benchmarks, average bench 460% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1602 1598 1602 1609 1609 1608 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 1,806 Write 1,737 Mixed 1,810 SusWrite 1,604 392% 1,739 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 50.8 163% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 595 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 292 248% 374 MB/s
Poor: 299% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 592%
Corsair Neutron XT 960GB-$1,453 202 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 821GB free Firmware: SAFC01.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 443 444 444 446 449 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 458 Mixed 306 SusWrite 445 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 34 117% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 74.6 128% 252 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 112%
Crucial_ CT500MX200SS 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 197GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 381 338 230 132 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	52% Above average	Read 298 Write 361 Mixed 272 SusWrite 257 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 20.8 68% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 38.5 38% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 464GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 127 127 127 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 119 Write 122 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 126 70% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 436GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 117 119 119 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 118 68% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 188GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 97 98 98 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 76.5 Write 97.3 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 97.7 53% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 269GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 113 Write 115 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 107 64% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 465GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 125 126 126 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 118 Write 127 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 125 72% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 72%
Lacie 2Big Quadra v3 10TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free Firmware: 051E SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 70%
LaCie Rugged THB USB-C 5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4TB free, PID 1094 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 23 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.9% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 38.3 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 22.4 45% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.2 114% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 56%
AIOLO USB 3.1 500GB 106GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 18 20 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 34.5 Write 40.8 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 19.1 43% 32 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 88% 1.4 MB/s

Corsair Survivor 3.0 253GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 144GB free, PID 1a0a Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 82 77 64 78 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 23.2 Write 19.7 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 75.4 58% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.3 97% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2666C16-8GRB F4-2666C15-8GRR F4-2666C16-8GRB F4-2666C15-8GRR F4-2666C15-8GRR F4-2666C16-8GRB F4-2666C15-8GRR F4-2666C16-8GRB 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 56.3 MC Write 54 MC Mixed 46.4 149% 52.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 17 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	27"	1280 720	IVM660E XB2776QS-B1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	197x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	116x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16