| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 18.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5K PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080306 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '20 at 18:55 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 90% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40.8%
Average
|
40% 60.3 Pts
|
9% 70.4 Pts
|
5% 84.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Gigabyte(1458 34D6) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
|
3.5%
Terrible
|
3% 2.75 fps
|
4% 4.82 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 67 116 60 56 58 MB/s
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
33% 147 MB/s
|
31% 7.7 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
816GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 70 119 141 181 196 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
147% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
Corsair Survivor 3.0 253GB
66GB free, PID 1a0a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 21 21 19 26 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
22% 18.6 MB/s
|
32% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
20.1%
Poor
|
19% 6.77 GB/s
|
11% 4 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K PRO Builds (Compare 74 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 12x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 10x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 7x |
| GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $157 |