HP Laptop 15-dw3xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15-dw3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 881D
Memory14.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 12:41
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 265
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 519
58% 459 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 881D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 16.3
12% 14.9 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 11.5
11% 14 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Lexar SSD NM620 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1985
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,148
378% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 75.8
256% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,024
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 684
557% 799 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 233%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
789GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 115
Mixed 73.3
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.3
307% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Kllisre 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.4% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 19.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 16.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 0G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 14% 49 88 19 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD062E
Typical Laptop 15-dw3xxx Builds (Compare 2,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15-dw3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback