Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H11SSL-i
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 07:32
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core
CPU, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 65
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 885
78% 663 Pts
64-Core 4,203
260% 4,203 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 287 293 274 294 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 454
Mixed 396
SusWrite 296
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 42.7
137% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 279
209% 279 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 162 158 161 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 152
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 160
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
157% Outstanding
MC Read 68
MC Write 60.2
MC Mixed 61.7
181% 63.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 32.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 157%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback