MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 23:36
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 754
72% 595 Pts
64-Core 1149
71% 1149 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
Palit(1569 2208) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
208% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 397
Parallax 322
251% 342 fps
MRender 342
Gravity 251
Splatting 187
204% 260 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 208%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250GB
653GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 945 948 979 1012 1005 1010 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1,058
Mixed 1,064
SusWrite 983
246% 1,092 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 67.3
219% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 821
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 697
524% 705 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 210%
Great: 380%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
139GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 460 468 477 475 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 479
Mixed 458
SusWrite 469
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 51.3
171% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
288GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 207 161 164 162 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 471
Mixed 395
SusWrite 219
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 43
148% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 366
277% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3400 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 34.3
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 29.7
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback