MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 04:30
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 644
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Palit(1569 2208) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
201% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 400
Parallax 309
239% 334 fps
MRender 332
Gravity 239
Splatting 184
198% 252 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 201%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250GB
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 886 933 938 943 952 946 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,162
Write 904
Mixed 845
SusWrite 933
216% 961 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 55.4
162% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 702
524% 699 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 186%
Great: 380%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
143GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 449 458 467 470 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 478
Mixed 443
SusWrite 458
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 50.3
166% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
288GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 264 162 163 325 362 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
79.7% Very good
Read 77.5
Write 154
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 284
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 42.8
135% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 367
277% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3400 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 34.3
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 26.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback