Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus M32CD4-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170411
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '23 at 18:21
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$89 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 99 2-Core 196 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 333 46% 341 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP 38,816 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.1% Average	Lighting 47.3 Reflection 60.7 Parallax 70.3 38% 59.4 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 56.1 Splatting 44.3 43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB 3,654 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2317002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 165 165 183 180 183 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 351 Write 142 Mixed 159 SusWrite 173 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 10.2 68% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 77.9 87% 146 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 205GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 128 133 132 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 154 Write 129 Mixed 46 SusWrite 132 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KETECH 1x8GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 11.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 12.3 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	33	120	27"	1280 720	LYC0001 NS23-165

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	395x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	266x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $99Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	207x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	91x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	51x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	62x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	49x
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	21x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	105x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 51%, 2,347 samples	51x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16