Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KD  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 290
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 842
84% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,035
64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 6.1
4% 7.2 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 1
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA6-8D512 512GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ER23401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 79 80 75 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 2,234
Write 76.1
Mixed 125
SusWrite 77.1
132% 628 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 55.4
201% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 1471
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 164
274% 574 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 190%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 30.3
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 18.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical GA-G5 KD Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback