Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive481% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 18:49
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 210
2-Core 400
120% 231 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,166
118% 955 Pts
64-Core 1,386
86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 110%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
XFX(1EAE 7801) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.20.01.10
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 255
Parallax 499
203% 334 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 303
Splatting 291
249% 306 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4737 2536 2708 2144 2737 2412 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
481% Outstanding
Read 2,722
Write 4,564
Mixed 3,266
SusWrite 2,879
762% 3,358 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 107
369% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 2,056
DQ Write 1634
DQ Mixed 1,786
1,353% 1,825 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 481%
Great: 614%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$364
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 492 492 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 472
Mixed 457
SusWrite 491
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 64.6
217% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 135%
Great: 137%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
112GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 135 135 135 136 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 365
Write 138
Mixed 162
SusWrite 194
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 26
111% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 106
90% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 85%
Hua72302 0ALA640 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 52.1
Write 35.9
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 21
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 74%
Hua72302 0ALA640 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 53.4
Write 34.6
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 21
27% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
205% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 60.1
MC Write 69.7
MC Mixed 65.4
186% 65.1 GB/s
SC Read 51.5
SC Write 65.6
SC Mixed 57
166% 58 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 179%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MAG274QRF-QD
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 273%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback