Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 237% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 249% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	238% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	454% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230825
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '23 at 14:02
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$281 627 User benchmarks, average bench 109% AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 76.6 1-Core 186 2-Core 355 108% 206 Pts	4-Core 682 8-Core 1,184 113% 933 Pts	64-Core 1,806 112% 1,806 Pts
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 117%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900 6,228 User benchmarks, average bench 220% Asus(1043 05ED) ≥ 4GB Ram: 20GB, Driver: 23.9.3 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	238% Outstanding	Lighting 301 Reflection 419 Parallax 566 246% 429 fps	MRender 432 Gravity 250 Splatting 475 323% 385 fps
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 249%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB 10,369 User benchmarks, average bench 458% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4524 3572 2095 1900 2193 2488 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	454% Outstanding	Read 2,364 Write 4,614 Mixed 3275 SusWrite 2,795 742% 3262 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 257 4K Mixed 102 352% 138 MB/s	DQ Read 1,997 DQ Write 1605 DQ Mixed 1,731 1,315% 1,778 MB/s
Poor: 278% ↑ This bench: 454% Great: 614%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 116 Write 12.9 Mixed 33.8 50% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.3 103% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF560C36-16 2x16GB 10,381 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 50.3 MC Write 52.5 MC Mixed 50.6 146% 51.1 GB/s	SC Read 46.9 SC Write 52.6 SC Mixed 48.5 141% 49.3 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 202%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	360	24.5"	1920 1009	DEL42B9 DELL AW2523HF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 413%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 417%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $370Bench 117%, 4,023 samples	35x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $279Bench 112%, 4,548 samples	31x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $394Bench 116%, 2,844 samples	18x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	12x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $651Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	10x
RX 7900-XTAMD $900Bench 220%, 6,228 samples	8x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	17x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $88Bench 341%, 58,572 samples	11x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $190Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	5x

RAM
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 166%, 17,639 samples	13x
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples	6x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F162x16GBGBench 193%, 4,084 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $2,272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16