Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 14:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 330
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1204 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 63
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 79.5
51% 66.9 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 41.8
45% 57.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nforce 25625 - SSZS13 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0915A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 79 3.9 3.6 84 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 408
Write 279
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 29.9
39% 181 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 108 104 98 135 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 176
Write 26
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 120
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V02D4L88GB1G81G82400 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 23.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 8% 25 203 59 100 24" 1920 1009 ACR0C78 EK240Y H
Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback