Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 22:18
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 307
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 946
96% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 118
Parallax 157
137% 148 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
118% 151 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NV900-128 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1554
Write 483
Mixed 561
188% 866 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 29.1
203% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 409
DQ Mixed 327
266% 375 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 173%
Fanxiang S100 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: V1220B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 100 0.2 4.4 6.8 6.1 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 264
Write 131
Mixed 177
SusWrite 41.7
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 16
99% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 37.2
80% 155 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 108%
JAJS300M120C 120GB
54GB free
Firmware: U0104A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 175 82 81 82 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 486
Write 432
Mixed 386
SusWrite 154
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 25.7
135% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 38.2
98% 204 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 39.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1920 1009 HKC2431 24E3
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback