Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 21:10
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 314
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 966
96% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 118
Parallax 158
138% 148 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
118% 151 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NV900-128 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 308 162 109 103 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 452
Mixed 284
SusWrite 173
131% 605 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 20.8
112% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 331
284% 414 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 124%
Great: 173%
Fanxiang S100 1TB
146GB free
Firmware: V1220B0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 27,477
Mixed 6.7
2,845% 13,742 MB/s
4K Read 207
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
313% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 108%
JAJS300M120C 120GB
54GB free
Firmware: U0104A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 213 83 83 82 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80% Very good
Read 454
Write 405
Mixed 372
SusWrite 161
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 26.1
132% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 38.3
99% 205 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.7
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1920 1009 HKC2431 24E3
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback