Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 06:59
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 307
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 847
85% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 114
Parallax 156
135% 145 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
114% 145 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NV900-128 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 265 126 220 70 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,550
Write 483
Mixed 587
SusWrite 155
151% 694 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 27.1
190% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 131
124% 202 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 137%
Great: 173%
Fanxiang S100 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: V1220B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 43 4 39 235 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.4% Poor
Read 203
Write 246
Mixed 267
SusWrite 98.9
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 6.5
24% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 108%
JAJS300M120C 120GB
54GB free
Firmware: U0104A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 179 80 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 476
Write 410
Mixed 364
SusWrite 154
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 24.5
123% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 38.7
92% 187 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.5
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 144 23.8" 1920 1080 HKC2431 24E3
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback