Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive522% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 22:06
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$366
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 213
2-Core 422
127% 242 Pts
4-Core 815
8-Core 1,624
144% 1,220 Pts
64-Core 2,826
175% 2,826 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 122%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 883A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3524 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 150
Parallax 143
152% 160 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 162
Splatting 88.7
100% 126 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 127%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2091 3375 3710 3704 3665 3756 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
522% Outstanding
Read 4,220
Write 3,851
Mixed 3,022
SusWrite 3,384
813% 3,619 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 69.6
230% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,088
DQ Write 1317
DQ Mixed 1,710
1,272% 1,705 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 522%
Great: 685%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6400C4016G-DCCARGY 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
200% Outstanding
MC Read 74.4
MC Write 70.8
MC Mixed 72
207% 72.4 GB/s
SC Read 56.4
SC Write 80.2
SC Mixed 67.8
195% 68.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 202%
This bench: 200%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 41 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback