TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive511% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 216
2-Core 424
127% 243 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1,599
143% 1,210 Pts
64-Core 2,837
176% 2,837 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 122%
 Great: 126%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1737 4021 4060 3996 3017 1989 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
511% Outstanding
Read 4,243
Write 4,050
Mixed 3,172
SusWrite 3,137
820% 3,651 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 70.8
244% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 2,034
DQ Write 1,316
DQ Mixed 1,688
1,255% 1,679 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑
This bench: 511%
 Great: 685%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6400C4016G-DCCARGY 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
202% Outstanding
MC Read 76.3
MC Write 71.8
MC Mixed 71.8
209% 73.3 GB/s
SC Read 55.4
SC Write 79.5
SC Mixed 65.9
191% 66.9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 202% ↑
This bench: 202%
 Great: 202%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 39 144 0" 1280 720
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $310Bench 117%, 4,385 samples130x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD  $320Bench 113%, 4,545 samples73x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $219Bench 112%, 4,548 samples53x
GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia  $1,756Bench 370%, 25,956 samples45x
RX 7900-XTXAMD  $1,000Bench 257%, 5,548 samples44x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia  $773Bench 240%, 46,082 samples44x
SSD
Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBWD  $146Bench 513%, 26,880 samples39x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $155Bench 416%, 138,083 samples36x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $169Bench 460%, 45,230 samples21x
RAM
F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 190%, 9,902 samples38x
AX5U6400C4016G-DCCARGY 2x16GBAdataBench 202%, 2 samples29x
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 166%, 17,639 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback