PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | OEM B75 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210901 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 10 '23 at 20:03 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.65 GHz (avg)
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 258 340 300 331 298 MB/s
|
66.3%
Good
|
|||
Maxtor 6Y120M0 123GB-$34
17GB free
Firmware: YAR51HW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB
63GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 62 64 63 MB/s
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 67 | 55 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | PHLC155 PHL 243V7 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 228x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 160x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 69x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 88x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 78x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 42x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $250 |