Asrock Z490M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z490M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory48.2 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 04:48
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,013
95% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 226
Parallax 170
153% 195 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 137
Splatting 116
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 287 264 251 265 262 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 2,056
Write 1,906
Mixed 1,675
SusWrite 297
331% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 62.2
208% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 735
551% 742 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 198%
Great: 271%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 290 268 268 270 270 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 470
Mixed 348
SusWrite 284
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 42.4
144% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 256
216% 317 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 129%
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EDFM90.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 57 58 57 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
524% Outstanding
Read 5,553
Write 61.2
Mixed 122
SusWrite 55.8
301% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 736
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 7.5
1,127% 249 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 524%
Great: 246%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 493GB
459GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 489
Write 468
Mixed 384
SusWrite 86.3
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 39.2
140% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 252
215% 316 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 492GB
458GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 489
Write 466
Mixed 352
SusWrite 86.3
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 42.4
143% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 254
216% 316 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB
464GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 490
Write 451
Mixed 362
SusWrite 86.3
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 42.9
144% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 255
216% 316 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF 04CD F4-2133C15-8GIS 8C26 TIMETEC-UD4-2133 56GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.5% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.6" 1280 720 SAM7048 SAMSUNG
Typical Z490M Pro4 Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback