Micro Venus Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro Venus Series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen AHBIB
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 07:13
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 190
63% 116 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 318
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E50 8023) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3677
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 4.4
3% 5.1 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vickter SSD 512GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 412 418 422 467 466 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 343
Write 366
Mixed 285
SusWrite 431
81% 356 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 33.7
124% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 200
175% 259 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 24
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 24" 1280 720 DELA039 DELL S2409W
Typical Venus Series Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Micro Venus Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback