Chuwi LarkBox X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemChuwi LarkBox X  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI LarkBox X
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 17:10
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 23
1-Core 89
2-Core 122
42% 78 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 240
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E50 8023) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3677
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 5
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Airdisk 512GB SSD 512GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14546
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 350 350 381 407 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 327
Write 353
Mixed 329
SusWrite 375
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 29.3
111% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 268
196% 253 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x3GB
4 of 8 slots used
12GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 0" 1280 1000 XXX0000 FullHD TV
Typical LarkBox X Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi LarkBox X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback