Casper EXCALIBUR G900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G900  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLCB 001
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 20:35
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 503
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1248) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.57 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,346
Write 923
Mixed 863
231% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 54.1
175% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 220
223% 353 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 418
Mixed 366
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 37.6
134% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 210
182% 270 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-022.A00G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 206 58 144 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0804
Typical EXCALIBUR G900 Builds (Compare 986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback