Casper EXCALIBUR G900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G900  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLCB 001
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 233
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 484
55% 433 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1248) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 93.1
Parallax 4.6
4% 34.2 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 5.7
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 212 170 173 155 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.9% Very good
Read 250
Write 103
Mixed 238
SusWrite 208
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 31.5
115% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 201
175% 261 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 100%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
477GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 819 797 824 836 841 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,221
Write 864
Mixed 789
SusWrite 814
206% 922 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 44.9
148% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 222
219% 344 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 163%
Great: 209%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 7.2 8.1 7.5 7.6 8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 9.2
SusWrite 6.6
13% 7.9 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Mixed 0
133% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-022.A00G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 8.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G900 Builds (Compare 980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $45
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback