Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 11:14
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 943
88% 734 Pts
64-Core 1375
85% 1375 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 120
Parallax 128
91% 120 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 89.8
80% 99.4 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$123
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,625
Write 3,306
Mixed 3,005
669% 2,979 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 89.8
279% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,410
DQ Write 1,079
DQ Mixed 1,227
922% 1,238 MB/s
Poor: 275% Great: 507%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 413
Mixed 324
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 24.8
109% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 37.5
71% 140 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVGB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.9
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback