Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 15:47
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 950
89% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,437
89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.3% Good
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 68.8
53% 71.1 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 98
Splatting 59
75% 97.2 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$123
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,464
Write 3,499
Mixed 2,674
648% 2,879 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 97.9
313% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1392
DQ Write 1,095
DQ Mixed 1,220
919% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 275% Great: 507%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 413
Mixed 372
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 25.9
121% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 37
72% 145 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVGB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35.5
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.2
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback