Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 15:51
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 76.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 269
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 893
86% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,273
79% 1,273 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 88.3
Reflection 102
Parallax 75.4
72% 88.6 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 87.7
Splatting 85.8
82% 103 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 343
Write 375
Mixed 402
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 25.9
110% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 37.5
73% 147 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVGB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 30
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback