Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FL
Memory12.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 01:46
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 142
56% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 54
23% 142 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1FBE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 2
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 134 54 54 75 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 1,183
Write 799
Mixed 752
SusWrite 95.6
157% 708 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 45.4
151% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 328
206% 240 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 40 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F6
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback