Lenovo 90NC00LBGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90NC00LBGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3717
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 20:43
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 950
91% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,221
76% 1,221 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 194
Parallax 182
163% 192 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 146
Splatting 129
122% 152 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 139%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1210 1560 1713 1417 1056 862 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,989
Write 2,246
Mixed 1,828
SusWrite 1303
415% 1,842 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 69.1
237% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1039
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 899
666% 887 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 272%
Great: 332%
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
588GB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2282 2343 2407 2371 2376 2419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
403% Outstanding
Read 2,735
Write 2,435
Mixed 2,343
SusWrite 2,366
556% 2,470 MB/s
4K Read 79.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 102
338% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1110
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 990
740% 989 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 403%
Great: 587%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
829GB free
Firmware: P4CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2266 2302 2294 2197 940 2095 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 1,804
Write 2,344
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 2,016
439% 1,941 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 69.8
235% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 1,052
779% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 313%
Great: 370%
Intel SSDSC2KI128G8 72GB
63GB free
Firmware: LHF001D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.9% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 131
Mixed 192
SusWrite 130
52% 239 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 56.5
179% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 149
128% 194 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.9% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 19% 26 217 60 144 27" 2560 1377 ACR06C1 XV272U
History: Score 19: 0P 2R 3G 0B | Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B
Typical 90NC00LBGE Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90NC00LBGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $726
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback