Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 20:03
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 66.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 278
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,021
93% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,952
121% 1,952 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.7% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 63
Parallax 90.3
55% 73.6 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 50.3
51% 64.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1229 829 790 816 820 805 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 1,782
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 882
312% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 65.1
222% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 1,048
791% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 229%
Great: 276%
Sandisk Plus 2TB A3N
992GB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2066 2018 2093 2141 2107 2021 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 1,757
Write 2,234
Mixed 1,878
SusWrite 2,074
450% 1,986 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 61.9
224% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,164
883% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 305%
This bench: 320%
Great: 391%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GIS CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GIS 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 22.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 34" 3440 1369 LHCFFFF 34WQHD100C-V3
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback