Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 19:56
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 65.7 1-Core 138 2-Core 273 84% 159 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 974 91% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,890 117% 1,890 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.2% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 93.5 56% 76.1 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 50.4 51% 64.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 679GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,264 Write 1,521 Mixed 1,221 299% 1,335 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 54 200% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 1,254 DQ Write 893 DQ Mixed 884 712% 1,010 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Sandisk Plus 2TB A3N 3 User benchmarks, average bench 383% 992GB free Firmware: 33006000 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 1,696 Write 2,121 Mixed 1,765 418% 1,861 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 60.8 215% 78.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,399 DQ Write 1,056 DQ Mixed 1,172 892% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 369% Great: 391%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GIS CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GIS 32GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.7% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 23.9 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 21.5 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	51	60	34"	1280 720	LHCFFFF 34WQHD100C-V3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,150x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,721x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,261x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	917x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	885x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	701x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	600x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	305x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	300x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	277x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,467

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16