Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory	14.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230303
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 141 2-Core 272 85% 160 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 795 79% 643 Pts	64-Core 879 54% 879 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 13FC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 10 Parallax 5.8 4% 7 fps	MRender 8.5 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 7.2 6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB 18,245 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,625 Write 1,210 Mixed 699 260% 1,178 MB/s	4K Read 60 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 56.5 192% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 446 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 171 155% 245 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 297%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 500GB 933 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 90GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 304 213 264 179 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 941 Write 1,054 Mixed 1,230 SusWrite 413 205% 909 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 53.8 169% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 882 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 614 445% 593 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 321%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905700-072.A01G 24GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 23.8 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 15.7 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	2	216	59	72	15.5"	1280 720	BOE090F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	3,755x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	208x
Gen Intel Core i5-11260H11thBench 72%, 2,929 samples	91x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	2,316x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples	888x
RTX 3050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 56%, 5,186 samples	713x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	1,443x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	1,085x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	312x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	904x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	663x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GBMicronBench 42%, 8,707 samples	270x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16