Lenovo PC22ZH7Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo PC22ZH7Z  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 32DD
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 23:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 288
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 875
88% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Legend(17AA 32DD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.77 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 8.6
7% 9.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EL2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,774
Write 2,917
Mixed 2,672
624% 2,787 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 95.1
313% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,200
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 1,024
772% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 419%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
59GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1506
Write 1,737
Mixed 1,405
347% 1,549 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 72.6
250% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 1,002
746% 998 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2666HSE-16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 15 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 Q32V3WG5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback